Why Are We Learning Arithmetic?

[I didnt bother to check grammar and spelling, so proceed at your own risk. In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is King. You may pick through the garbage for gems. I don't have enough to properly nourish my mind. But I still easily run circles around the masses, though crippled by the poverty born of an unrepentent, evil age.]

It's worth learning arithmetic for the pure joy of it. And moral math is like it.

My family were never world-class mathematicians. Nor did we need to be. Advanced mathematics isn't required, when most of the world is still baffled by the basic arithmetic required to balance their checkbook, to figure profit and loss, to figure a balance sheet.

In a mixed-race, mixed-sex classroom, my Finnish mind for numbers proved second-best to the skills of a tall, blonde girl with a stereotypically Scandanavian first name, in case there was any doubt about her Viking capabilities to dominate in this subject.

I don't deny women are capable of arithmetic. And sometimes very advanced mathematics. Even Calculus.

How would NASA land rovers on Mars if they couldn't find a black woman, in this "politically correct" [incorrect] world if they couldn't mathematically deduce some way of making her efforts seem as though they'd somehow contributed to science?

This must have been a miracle of modern figuring.

As a part nudist Finlander, (especially as a child), part Puritan prude, I was slightly racially inferior at arithmetic in elementary school, but a natural speech-maker and speech-writer.

What I lacked, by comparison to a middle-class racial superior of the brother race of Swedes, I more than made up for in grasping the relevance and application of numbers and logical figuring in finding the truth, however uncomfortable the answer may be.

Today, we understand little more about Psychopaths than we did in ancient times.

These people have certain earthly advantages in business, for example. Focus, fearlessness, charm, mental toughness, mindfulness, action-orientation, and, of course, ruthlessness.

These aren't always advantages in every environment, but they're more likely to help in the business world.

One question which is made famous in pop psychology is a question believed (by the masses) to spot an ("evil") psychopath in a single.

The intellectual laziness of this clueless attempt will become apparent.

The real psychopathic tests are far more extensive.

One popular question, which may or may not appear on such tests, suggests we suppose that it's possible to save several lives by pushing a large man from a train platform to stop an oncoming train.

The question is absurd. Of course you wouldn't stop a train by pushing a man in front of it. You couldn't even stop the train by pushing another train in front of it.

Even if you stopped the locomotive, those train cars would keep rolling, de-railing and piling up, and killing many of the passengers, if any. Certainly delaying the cargo, putting that stretch of track out of service for quite a while.

Those train cars aren't cheap, you know. And neither is the cargo.

It's a dumb question. Personally, I'd roll over anyone dumb enough to lie on the train tracks.

But supposing it were possible to stop a train by shooting a fat man standing between you and the cord for the emergency brakes, for example, only the psychopath is able to do the math, saying, "If you knew it would stop the train and save 5 people, why not?"

"Non-psychopaths are such moral nitwits!", we should all humbly admit.

Non-psychos are also capable of doing the same sort of math, but they don't show their work.

They're not willing to sacrifice a life by throwing a lever re-routing a train.

For these ruthless non-psychose, to throw a large man in front of a train damages more than a train, the tracks, the cargo, and the schedule.

It might hurt their precious reputation.

But maybe they're more interested in making sure the trains keep running on schedule. Lives be damned. We've got a timetable to keep!

But probably not part of their thought process. Remember, the non-psychos only care about themselves.

The ordinary man is selfish. A monster God wishes to destroy. (Look it up. It's in the scripture.)

The commoner knows that throwing a man in front of a train will get him arrested, possibly imprisoned for life. Maybe even executed for murder.

And more than that, it might not work. It probably won't work.

The non-psychopath has a track record of dismal failures to consider. He'd probably kill the fat man for nothing, the victims would die anyway, so why even try?

Going to jail for murder is no fun. He's more concerned with the integrity of his own anus than the fate of the hapless victims tied to the tracks.

This "good deed" increases the casualty count from one to 2, in the best case scenario. Or, if it doesn't work, the five who'll die anyway, plus the fatty and the do-gooder himself, awaiting the electric chair in failure, shame, ridicule.

It's all too much to bear!

The lives of these 5 aren't worth the loss of 2, especially when you're one of those 2.

See what I mean? Selfish. The psychopath has no fear of the consequences. He is morally superior, in this case. And, perhaps, in all cases.

The psychopath can fix his reputation by framing someone else or by making it look like an accident.

I mean, preferably an accident, right? Since this once again reduces the casualty rate. Framing a man keeps the casualty count low. It's 2 people. Especially if you're not one of them.

I'm supposing, of course, that you're saving the five by re-routing the train, which hops the track and still kills at least another dude, right?

Or that might make it 3, since the psycho goes to prison, the fatty dies, and the train hops the track and kills the third.

But the 5 are still saved. What a hero!

Unless the conductor is killed by flying debris, or a hot coal ends up in his pants from the sudden change of speed and direction of the locomotive.

What a tangled web we weave, when we first we practice to deceive ourselves that we're heroes.

But this is only the wisdom of instinct. We're not thinking things through with the brains God gave us.

Maybe those 5 people, tied to a railroad track, for example, deserve to die. After all, they allowed themselves to be kidnapped and tied to those railroad tracks. Idiots. The world is better without them.

In which case, the only problem is there aren't enough idiot tied to the railroad tracks.

But 5 is idiots might be enough for now.

If you've tied 5 people to the railroad tracks, for example, so that you could throw a fat, godless traitor onto the tracks and be hailed as a hero in the press, presumably to gain the reputation for selflessness, and have articles and books written about your heroism, going on tour giving interviews about the 5 people you "saved".

Maybe this reputation for being a selfless savior willing to get your hands dirty would get you into political office, despite all delays to the train schedule. And of course, the pressure-washing crew getting the bits of innards off the locomotive.

And as a politician, you'd have the power to drop napalm on whole countries full of idiots, their grandparents, grandchildren, and their little dog, too.

Doing the Lord's work. And it pays very well. What could be more satisfying to a politician than setting little brown children on fire? That's right. Being able to congratulate yourself for doing so. How selfless!

But even in this case, we've failed to complete our moral arithmetic. We've solved the problem, but not completely.

What if, like those 5 people on the train tracks who deserve to die, the people you're protecting with napalm from the scourge or rock-throwing Arab toddlers, also deserve to die?

And this is where Jesus, if you check the answers in the back of the book, comes in useful.

The fact is that not one is righteous and all have sinned, and are deserving of death. Not even Jesus is righteous. So killing someone, however brown, Arab, or Congonese they are, in order to save a rich white patriot, however sweet and loving he is, is barely worth lifting a finger to do.

Even a sniper will refuse to exert more than 5 pounds of force in the effort to save humanity. Because by and large, humans simply aren't worth the trouble.

Jesus, even in the flesh, is in full agreement with our Old Testament God, who at one point, said he regretted creating mankind.

Morally speaking, being a white man is like being the world's tallest midget. It's pretty good, for a midget. But to someone who's as tall as our Father (morally speaking), we're nit-picking to say that a typical Arab is less moral than a typical Scandanavian.

One feeds the poor. The other stones a sodomites. It's like looking at Koko the gorilla who doesn't fling her poo and comparing her to Harambe, who doesn't crush a niglet when he has the chance.

A comparison can be made between fornicating whites and slave-trading Arabs, but take the plank out of your own eye before taking the speck out of your brother's eye. I mean, Christ our Lord has improved all races. Even the slant-eyes.

Even the synagogue of Satan is improved by the long history of massacres and the hanging of Leo Frank. Whenever an ocean liner sails off into the wide blue ocean to sink and a single "Jew" is aboard, the world is massively and instantly improved by one drowned rat, though a thousand white men may drown at the same time.

Each of them tempted onto the maiden voyage of the "unsinkable" ship.

When the many, many "Jewish" serial killers are put to death in Christian countries, when the many "Jewish" pedophiles are imprisoned with rapist Negroes they brought to America on slave ships to enslave and racially destroy, the world is infinitely better off without them.

And God being morally superior, He makes godless women walk around like bait for serial killers.

Psychopaths can spot a victim by the way she walks.

In other words, a woman without any Jesus in her heart is easy pickings for a man like (((Ted Bundy.))) So easily deceived, voluntarily getting into cars with strange men, clueless about the existence of evil in the world, clueless that the devil roams about to and fro on the on the Earth, seeking whom he may devour. Clueless about the value of her parents and their wisdom and the value of our Father in heaven, and His infinite wisdom.

She deserves to be tied to the railroad tracks with the rest. In fact, if we lined up all the people who deserved to go on the tracks, our trains would never get anywhere.

In the instance of a Christian psychopath, a man must flip the switch to re-route the train to kill as many people as humanly possible, in case one of them might be a "Jew."

Thank God Jesus showed up to clear up all the confusion.

In fact, we're to feed the poor. But why? To heap coals on the heads of our enemies, feed them when they're hungry.

It doesn't say "To heap coals on the heads of your enemies, give them a job when they're jobless."

It does, however say that those who don't work will be forced to work, (think, for example, of the GULAGs of Siberia, and of the farmers forced to farm their land in Venezuela, despite socialist price-fixing) and he who doesn't provide for his family is worse than an unbeliever.

The math doesn't care who does it. Truth is truth, Christian "psychopath" or not.

Christians are far and away more ruthless in their actions than all the psycho politicians put together. They'll kill you with a plate of sandwiches.

And it will work, too. God said so. Therefore it must be true.

Put away your sticks of Dynamite and cases of grenades, white supremacists, and pick up a knife and a jar of peanut butter. The Lord your God has spoken. And His word is law, soldiers of the Apocalypse.

My Finnish blood draws me to arithmetic, wisdom, lakes, hot springs, and oddly enough, nudity.

Have patience. I mention nudity for good reason. Adam and Eve were nude in the Garden of Eden, and one day, we'll return to doing things God's way instead of our own.

Nudity can be at odds with the impulses of my prudish Puritan blood, bred from those who rejected the heathen ways of the traitors to Christ in the Church of England and their divorce ceremonies.

A divorce, in many ways, is like a voodoo dance. Evil spirits are afoot, no good can come from it, and it's not what our Father wants us to do.

God made man without a stitch of clothing. After Adam and Eve rebelled against God, they covered themselves. You don't meditate on that bit of scripture very often, do you?

Later, the law said women should dress modestly. Does that seem like a contradition to you?

If you ever wondered, "Gee, I wonder what the extent of the rebellion against God is", everyone who wears clothing is like these two rebels, who thought they knew better than to obey God.

And all were astonished by his teaching.

The law given to Moses, you'll notice, differs from what was given to Adam.

The law exists to get us back to doing the will of God, and not one jot or tittle of it will pass away until all is accomplished.

In other words, it may not be necessary to wear clothes in the kingdom of heaven, but until all is accomplished, each of us lives under the curse of our disobedience, enslaved, and confined to clothes.

If we remove our clothes in public while the prince of this world still is in power, then we'll be punished for our wickedness.

We are mourning in sackcloth and ashes. Our clthes are like the potato sacks of an ancient funeral procession. Ever wondered why those starving runway fashion models don't smile very much?

How can the law tell us to dress modestly when God's will is unchanging? The answer is simple.

God's will is unchanging.

The law exists for our benefit.

If a sign is hung hung over the bathroom which says, "Don't put your sister's head in the toilet," it's put there for your benefit.

If you don't know the will of God, it's for one reason:

Because you don't want to.

Because you want to put your sister's head in the toilet, for example.

Because you want to put your penis in some kind of animal or diseased harlot or hole in the wall to be serviced by a stranger.

Because you want to throw knives in the house and crawl around on the carpet, putting holes in your jeans.

God never had any such intentions for you. You came up with this garbage on your own.

You started riding horses instead of donkeys on your own.

You started eating things that rot your teeth.

You started building statues and cathedrals to celebrate your piousness while the poor starve beneath them.

You started saying "Judeo-Christian" as if it's a thing.

You gave millions of dollars worth of your sevices to an evil publicly traded company, and congratulated yourselves for tossing a few nickels to the priests and paupers.

You congratulated yourself for watching Hollywood movies instead of porn, but would have learned more truth from the pornography.

You built and defended monuments to the founding fathers who arrogantly proclaimed themselves the servants of a clockmaker God who has no effect in the world, so freedom of speech is more important than laws against blasphemy, and that religious freedom doesn't include the religious freedom to rain down brimstone on cities full of sodomites, no matter how much money they have.

"Who told you you were naked?" is the equivalent of, "WHY are you putting your sister's HEAD in the TOILET?!"

God is not happy with the "freedom" we've enslaved ourselves to, the "freedom" we've chosen to impose on our progeny.

Got therefore improves our sinful race by sending the sinful to be decapitated by Muslims, to have their churches burned, shot up, their continents invaded, has made Kenyan foreigners like Obama into their king and nearly threw the election to Hillary to alert you to the fact that you're doing things your own way, and these are the beginnings of the consequences.

And worse than all these, our Father in heaven has sent me.

If you think clinging to your guns will help defend you from the Minister of God's Wrath and his Army of the Apocalypse,  you're sadly mistaken. For example...

As far as I know, Yemen never gave up it's guns.

Guns weren't nearly enough to hold on to their food, and they're wasting away in a famine with no one to rescue them.

Too bad. Everyone I've ever met from Yemen was a nice guy.

Nice.

Nice means fool. Literally. Look it up.

Christian ruthlessness is what's required. Not guns.

Men in prison have no guns. The Aryan Brotherhood, for example, has no guns.

But they're feared, and should be. The deadliest force in any prison. Ruling by ruthlessness, from behind bars, even in super-max prisons.

By necessity, they're students of murder, like Moses before them. And Abraham, willing to kill his only child, if God requires it.

In their position, they must ambush their enemies in self-defense.

But I'm not in prison. And I'm not a student of murder.

There is a difference between murder and massacre. Men commit murder. Armies commit massacre and genocide. Moses led armies who massacred cities, who genocided Amalekites, Jezubites, etc.  A man who loves God and loves his brother approves of massacre, and doesn't confuse it with murder.

Because the throne is attained by righteousness, and God installs the government, a man who fails in his duty to massacre the wicked cannot gain his throne or keep it.

I believe our race is not improved by murder, but massively improved by massacre.

The massacre of "nice" idiots, the driving of lemmings off the cliff is high-paid work. The highest, in fact. There's no other industry worth considering, in "nice" times.

There is insufficient ruthlessness in the world, and up to 10 times more people should be fired from their jobs each year than are currently fired.

Heads must roll.

The reason why they're not? Because not enough managers are being fired.

Which means not enough executives are being fired.

Which means not enough CEOs and boards of directors are being fired.

Which means there aren't enough "Ruthless People" using "Other Peoples' Money" (to use two Danny DeVito references) to do God's will. There aren't enough Andrew Carnegie's in the world. And in the days of Rome, Crassus fulfilled the role of taking the homes of people foolish enough to build wooden palaces.

Richest man in history was Crassus. The runner-up was undoubtedly the "Steel King", Andrew Carnegie, a man with a will of steel, suppressing wages to produce cheap steel to build America's railroads, bridges, eventually skyscrapers and other infrastructure.

Some believe the Rothschild family are trillionaires.

Remind me. What is it that they do?

Ah, yes. They take out the garbage. They purge the genetic filth. The morally weak.

It's an odd case of the tallest midget being taller than the tallest basketball player. The best of the worst is better than  the best of the best race. Maybe because the rabbinical teachings of the synagogue of Satan suggest the best of the gentiles should be killed, leaving the meek to inherit the earth.

Nothing new there, for those who can read the fossil record. The war of Neanderthal versus Cro-Magnon destroys the biggest brains of each race over and over again. A fact which shows up in the book of Isaiah.

The moral of the story is that we are not smarter than our ancestors, who did more with less.

Let it be understood that in these times, there is insufficient ruthlessness in the cut-throat business world, until every man who's a liability to the shareholders is shown the door.

Andrew Carnegie reportedly gave away 90% of his $310 billion dollar wealth (in estimated 2013 dollars) before he died.

The most successful men in history? Andrew Carnegie? Ruthless. Read this from his speech on the Gospel of Wealth.

"For one of the serious obstacles to the improvement of our race is indiscriminate charity. It were better for mankind that the millions of the rich were thrown into the sea than so spent as to encourage the slothful, the drunken, the unworthy."

- Andrew Carnegie

Carnegie? Ruthless philanthropist.

Crassus? Ruthless.

Rockefeller? Ruthless.

Moses? Megalomaniacially ruthless on a Biblical scale. And the very definition of it.

Mohammed? Of course, you know the answer.

God lavished more rewards on them than the greedy, selfish, self-made, piss-poor drunkards giving service to none but themselves.

A God who is rigorously active in this world to this very moment, rewarding each according to his righteousness in GOD'S eyes, not man's.

Those who are cursed and burned in ovens have less rewards.

While so many crusade to end the genocidal famines, to my knowledge only one living man on this planet, Fair Use, one of the many  blood brothers of Jesus Christ, openly endeavors to increase them by several orders of magnitude and fulfill God's prophecy by throwing fire on the Earth. Like in the days of Noah.

Why? Because I've done the math.

The place to begin this massacre is, of course, in the corporate world that owns all governments, all politicians, and all mass media. There, the insufficiently ruthless heads must roll.

"The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers"

- William Shakespeare's Henry VI, Part 2, Act IV, Scene 2.

A line which could only be considered controversial if you were foolish enough to let lawyers run things. Such as the lawyers in Congress, in corporate America, in the banking industry.

Jesus renders lawyers obsolete. Judge wisely, oh judges of the Earth. Samson was a judge. No law degree necessary. Killed thousands with a donkey's jawbone instead of a sheepskin. Imagine that.

If you turn to the legal profession for justice, you haven't judged very wisely. You've gone against God's definition of what a judge is. Judge Dredd is a mockery of judges like Samson and Dylann Roof.

These corporate Americans must be handed their walking papers in a "bloody massacre" of weeping and waiting and gnashing of teeth, cast into outer darkness, into the eternal fire God made for the devil, the children of the devil, and their servants.

The only throne to be attained on this Earth is the single throne of righteousness. God made one throne. And it belongs to the most righteous. Not the least.

If you're too nice (foolish) to live, then you must die a traitor's death, purged by disease, famine, and war. Whether you wave a patriotic flag in battle or pray like the Hypocrites in public, God isn't nice, and doesn't reward nice men, and His thoughts are not our thoughts.

Nor would he put a nice man at the head of the Army of the Apocalyse to right 55,000 years of wrongs at the end of the age, at the trumpet call of the day of the Lord.

If men have chosen to serve money instead of Jesus, then let each man receive full payment of what he's owed. Let him be buried in the piles of money he serves. The cursed gold and silver he carries is his gravestone.

Each one who has prayed to money instead of praying to the Messiah has served the master of death, not the God of the living.

When money is printed, it often states what it's good for. "Good for all debts, public and private", for example.

The devil's money is not good for the payment of sins. It's acceptible to man. Not God.

To our God, no payment but the blood of Christ is acceptible.

The Father doesn't accept your fine works and kind and generous deeds. Your free beer and wet t-shirt contests and the equivalent.

Your deeds are filthy rags to the Lord.

If you don't believe Jesus is the Messiah, you don't have your payment when the Lord comes to collect it. Entry into the kingdom of heaven isn't free. Few there be that find it.

To those who pretend to believe in God but don't believe Jesus is the Messiah, to who claim to be the children of Abraham but don't do Abraham's deeds, their deeds are also filthy rags to the Lord.

Some believe in Jesus, who says...

1) John 3:16 For God so loved the world... whomsoever believes in [Jesus] shall be saved.

2) Love your brother.

"You shall not hate your brother in your heart, but you shall reason frankly with your neighbor, lest you incur sin because of him. You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself"

Do you love your brother, Jesus? How about your brother, the Christian Nazi?

The synagogue of Satan does NOT love Christians, Americans, Jesus, fascists, Nazis, and they are, of course, not Christians, and are not, by any means, our people.

3) If you love Jesus (which you will if you believe, and therefore the sign is that you love your brother, Jesus), "do my commandments."

One of these commandments would include the love of Adolfus Hitler, who, like any real Christian, loved his brothers, his kinsman, and continues to be hated for it, just as Jesus is hated for loving his brother Christians, no matter what the children of the devil say about it.

In other words, you are saved if you believe, which means you love Jesus, which means you must "do my commandments" which includes "every jot and tittle of the law" which includes massacring those who attack, but refuses to surrender.

Sounds like I'm saying, "If you don't love the white Christian males, you deserve to die", then you're maybe you're starting to understand the meaning Jesus and Moses intended to convey, no matter what the "Christian" priesthood of Satan says in a time of lies.

The people who are to be massacred on Christ's command, by the way, may include some people and livestock, men and women, elderly and children you'd rather not massacre, but until all is accomplished, every jot and tittle of the law is in full force and effect.

And every man lives under the curse of disobedience. And their children, too. The reason why I was attacked by dogs is because I was born into a country ruled by the children of the devil.

The reason little girls threw cats at me is because they're possessed by Satan.

The reason why little white girls tortured cats is because they live in a Satanic country.

The reason why anyone would hate Adolf Hitler is because they are ruled by Satan instead of Christ, because they live by the laws of Satan, not the laws of Moses, because they serve Lucifer, not God.

I have written these words on the final authority of our Lord Jesus, the author of the imminent final solution which he calls, "The Day of the Lord."

So do the math.